As the deployment of 5G networks gathers steam across the state, several consulting firms have emerged as purported experts in this field. They promise to utilize their long held experience to guide municipalities through the challenges and uncertainties of 5G build outs.
A concerning practice has recently emerged: Some 5G consultants promise that a municipality may dictate precise locations for 5G small cell antennas, and that a wireless carrier must utilize large unsightly concealment poles for every single 5G antenna site.
These are misleading and unenforceable promises, in direct conflict with federal laws and regulations.
5G deployments are unlike previous deployments. They involve the use of large numbers of small cell antennas on poles and similar structures in the public rights-of-way. They also involve an extensive intersection of local, state and federal laws and, thus, are unfamiliar to most municipalities.
For this reason, local governments often place complete trust in their 5G consultants to what is in the best interest of the town. A town may unwittingly heed a consultant’s recommendation to adopt a 5G ordinance without closely examining its validity, enforceability and reasonableness.