Ciattarelli Calls Out New Jersey’s ‘Political Buddy System’

Melinda Castro Ciattarelli, who is currently testing the waters to gauge the viability of a run for US Senate is calling out the political buddy system today.

“As I call and travel around the state one thing is clear, politics are broken and have become what Ronald Reagan called ‘…the seat of a buddy system that functions for its own benefit…’,” Melinda Castro Ciattarelli said.

“That buddy system is made up of individuals who pick which candidates should run and who should handle their campaign.” Castro Ciattarelli added, “This goes for both parties.”

Castro Ciattarelli said, “For 20 plus years I’ve had a front row seat and watched the buddy system in action. It’s broken and needs to be fixed. Whether or not I decide to run for office, I will work to remove bullies from our state politics. New Jerseyans deserve better.”

(Visited 3,165 times, 1 visits today)

8 responses to “Ciattarelli Calls Out New Jersey’s ‘Political Buddy System’”

  1. Totally agree with fixing the system, nobody knows who they are voting for or how they got on the ballot. The election process has become a joke. Voters vote the party line no matter who is on it. There should be no party lines then people’s votes would mean something. End the party domination

  2. Totally agree with fixing the system, nobody knows who they are voting for or how they got on the ballot. The election process has become a joke. Voters vote the party line no matter who is on it. There should be no party lines then people’s votes would mean something. End the party domination

  3. Right, no buddy system here. Her husband running for governor, she’s running for Senate. A strange way of railing against the political buddy system

  4. The left-wing “useful idiots” are out in force again in the comments section. They still don’t get the point. The “buddy” system in New Jersey is that voters don’t get to vote on who they want. The candidates are already picked, annointed and voted in by the respective parties and party leaders. Then there is the fraudulent computer voting systems that back everything up. If you look at the past 10 elections, you’ll notice a pattern. Democrats always win by 54-55% to 45-46%. It’s just enough for people not to challenge the computer voting scores–until now, that the major computer voting systems have turned out to be fraudulent, a scam, hacked by outside sources, and are to the point that the Phillippine government has voted to prohibit their use because they are not protected and are used to interfere with and throw elections.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

News From Around the Web

The Political Landscape