Global Refugee Crisis Grows As Failure To Address It Prompts Anti-Immigrant Sentiments In Reaction

The recent Mendham Township blowback over a Facebook post  by a Republican deputy mayor that equated undocumented immigrants to “hundreds of rabid, messy, mean raccoons” that had taken over a basement, went viral but died down after the author apologized and resigned. But the local controversy comes at a time when similarly intense nativist sentiments are on the rise around the world, even as the planet faces its worst refugee crisis since the Second World War.

Mendham Township Mayor Richard P. Diegnan, also a Republican, did his best to distance himself from the post, which was an homage to President Trump, that the former deputy-mayor  posited was popular because he was the one “exterminator” who could handle the job of getting rid of the raccoons that had taken over the hypothetical basement.

“The Facebook Post does not reflect the views of the Mendham Township Committee or the residents of Mendham Township. I strongly condemn the hurtful viewpoints expressed in the Facebook Post and I believe all people shall be treated with dignity and respect,” Diegnan said in a statement.

No doubt, the Mayor’s remarks were sincere. But it’s important to remember that it was only back in November, on the eve of a hotly contested local race in Mendham Township, that lawn signs sprung up, warning voters to “Vote Republican” or face the prospect that New Jersey would become a so-called “Sanctuary State” embracing the undocumented. Those signs stayed up until after the election.

At the same time, at the top of the ticket,  former Lieutenant Governor Kim Guadagno, also tacked to the right, playing the fear card, running TV ads that linked Phil Murphy’s pro-immigrant stand, as being equivalent  to embracing MS-13, the violent El Salvadoran street gang. Meanwhile, down in Virginia, GOP Gubernatorial candidate Ed Gillespie fell back on the same strategy against his Democratic rival,  Ralph Northam.


Both Guadagno and Gillespie  lost, yet national polling shows there’s still a loyal base for the anti-immigrant worldview and it will no doubt remain a powerful issue in 2018. This nativist pitch gets real traction in communities where tens of millions of American households saw no recovery and were left behind by a global free trade economy and corporate consolidation.

This is not a uniquely American socio-seismic fault line. In 2017 the New York Times reported the nativist sentiment was getting electoral traction across Europe, where an unprecedented surge of immigrants was testing civil societies historically, once  known for their tolerance.

“Amid a migrant crisis, economic inequality, growing disillusionment with the European Union and a sense of lost national identity, right wing parties in a growing number of European countries have made electoral gains,” reported the New York Times in October of last year. The ideological spectrum ranged from “populist and nationalist to far-right fascist.”

In reading the platforms of the various anti-immigrant parties that have sprung up there are similar themes to the ones raised in the former deputy mayor of Mendham’s Facebook post. “This country is weak, bankrupt, and our enemies are making fun of us,” he wrote. “We are being invaded by illegals, we are becoming a nation of victims where every Tom, Ricardo and Hasid is a special group with special rights to the point where we don’t recognize the country we were born and raised in.”

There’s a deep feeling of loss and grievance in those words, a  sense that there is just so much of the American Dream to go around and that it needs to be rationed for those that are deserving.

These sentiments also cast Americans as unwitting victims. There is no recognition of how our own government’s trade policies, our own national illegal drug consumption, and our ever expanding global war on terrorism, have all  played a role in destabilizing nations around the world. At some point in these places, local populations that feel the brunt take their chances and start  on their journey looking for somewhere safer.


This was brought home to me vividly when  I was working for WNYC back in 2006 covering the legal battle in Freehold, between undocumented Latino day- laborers, and the local municipality  which was trying to prohibit the men from using their downtown as a muster zone to connect with contractors to get work. The workers sued, alleging discrimination. The case was settled in arbitration.

In interviewing the day laborers I came across one man who explained that he had been a medical doctor from the Chiapas region of Mexico. That region’s local economy was based on small scale corn farmers but with the 1994 passage of the North American Free Trade Agreement the much cheaper corn produced by America’s corporate agribusiness flooded Mexico, collapsing the local economy and forcing farmers and their families off the land, into the cities and often up north to the U.S..

Back during the cold war with the ‘do-or-die’  epic battle between the Soviet Union and the United States  there was a bi-polar tension that kept a certain nation-state equilibrium. Neither super-power wanted a failed state and both were constantly vying to build the orbit of nations that saw them as the sun.

That dynamic tension is long gone. These days, national borders are being tested like never before, as an increasing number of nations teeter on the brink of failed state status.  All around the world chronic armed conflicts, and the growing frequency of natural disasters has produced an explosion in; international refugees who have been forced from their country, those that are internally displaced that have had to leave where they live, but have not yet left their country; and so-called “stateless” people.


According to the United Nations Refugee Agency, at the end of 2010 there were close to 34 million in these combined categories. By the end of 2016, that number had spiked to close to 68 million.  In 2010 the number of refugees topped 10 million. By 2016 it was over 22.5 million.

But the real dramatic growth was in the number of internally displaced people, who have had to leave where they have always lived but are still in their country of origin on the run. In 2010, there were 14.7 million such internally displaced persons. By 2016, according to the United Nations Refugee Agency, that number had hit 40.3 million.

The Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre, a non-governmental non-profit based in Geneva, Switzerland, estimates that more than half of those that have been internally displaced are victims of natural disasters— like hurricanes, tsunamis, earthquakes or prolonged drought.

To get a sense of the pace of this great unsettling, that is totally under-covered by the corporate news media,  consider the UN estimated that for every minute of 2016, 20 people were being forced from their homes. That’s  28,300 every day of that year. Add in the mix of over three million so-called stateless people, and you get a sense of the scale of the problem.

All totaled, this vulnerable at risk population is larger than the population of France or the United Kingdom, ranking it more populous than 180 nations.

So far, the Trump administration’s response has been to push for cutting the budget for the State Department and  slashing the aid to developing nations, while dramatically increasing the military budget. In the process, we are turning our backs on the growing swaths of the world where our fellow human beings are displaced from their homes. As months grow into years, it is the children that suffer the most. There’s no better place to foster tomorrow’s terrorist than in a refugee camp.

This is not a problem that we can solve by hiding behind a wall.

(Visited 443 times, 1 visits today)

News From Around the Web