NEW JERSEY: QUALITY OF LIFE INDEX SETTLES BACK; JERSEY SHORE PLANS ALMOST BACK TO NORMAL

NEW JERSEY: QUALITY OF LIFE INDEX SETTLES BACK;

JERSEY SHORE PLANS ALMOST BACK TO NORMAL

 

Few say marijuana legalization has impacted state’s quality of life

West Long Branch, NJ – The public’s views of New Jersey’s quality of life have settled back to normal from the pandemic rally effect recorded in last year’s Monmouth (“Mon-muth”) University Poll. The poll finds that the number of state residents making plans to visit the Jersey Shore this summer is back to near normal levels, although some families are hesitant about spending a week or more in a beach rental just yet. In other poll results, very few New Jerseyans think the recent legalization of recreational marijuana use has had any impact on the state’s quality of life. At the same time, a little more than half are actually aware it is, in fact, legal now.

Monmouth’s exclusive Garden State Quality of Life Index score now stands at +25. This is down from +37 in April 2020 during the early days of the pandemic, but is similar to the prior reading of +24 in September 2019. The prior high for this index was +31 in April 2012 and the prior low was +13 in February 2019. The current reading is in line with typical scores for this index over the past decade.

The quality of life index score has dropped across most areas in the state except urban ones. Responses from residents of urban communities result in a +20 score, which is similar to the +18 score last year. The current result puts these areas on more of a par with other parts of the state. The index currently stands at +26 in older towns and suburbs (down from +41 in 2020) and an identical +26 in growing suburbs (down from +45). Of note, the current poll marks the first time that urban sentiment is nearly the same as suburban views in Monmouth’s quality of life index trend going back to 2010.

“Perceptions of New Jersey’s quality of life have returned to more normal levels after experiencing a brief rally effect when the pandemic struck last year. However, the fact that ratings in urban communities held steady from that spike is worth watching. It may be a blip, but it could also signal increased optimism among these residents,” said Patrick Murray, director of the independent Monmouth University Polling Institute.

The Garden State Quality of Life Index was created by the Monmouth University Polling Institute in 2010 to serve as a resident-based indicator of the quality of life offered by the state of New Jersey. The index is based on five separate poll questions: overall opinion of the state as a place to live – which contributes half the index score – and ratings of one’s hometown, the performance of local schools, the quality of the local environment, and feelings of safety in one’s own neighborhood. The index can potentially range from –100 to +100.

Nearly 6 in 10 New Jerseyans say the state is either an excellent (16%) or good (43%) place to live, while 27% say it is only fair and 14% rate the state as poor. The current positive rating of 59% is down from 68% last year. The all-time high mark for the state rating was 84% positive in February 1987. The record low was 50% recorded in February 2019, but it had improved to 61% by September of that year. Over the past decade, the state rating has generally been in the low- to mid-60s.


GARDEN STATE QUALITY OF LIFE INDEX

NJ TOTAL

GENDER

AGE

RACE

INCOME

Male

Female

18-34

35-54

55+

White

Black/ Hispanic

<$50K

$50-100K

>$100K

May 2021

+25

+20

+29

+24

+24

+27

+25

+20

+17

+25

+31

April 2020

+37

+34

+41

+34

+38

+40

+43

+26

+29

+37

+44

September 2019

+24

+21

+26

+21

+20

+32

+31

+13

+18

+20

+33

February 2019

+13

+14

+12

+10

+11

+18

+17

+4

+2

+14

+20

April 2018

+18

+16

+20

+22

+14

+20

+22

+5

+8

+16

+27

July 2017

+25

+25

+24

+15

+26

+30

+32

+6

+8

+23

+41

July 2015

+18

+18

+18

+25

+11

+20

+24

+5

n/a

n/a

n/a

February 2015

+23

+21

+26

+26

+18

+28

+29

+10

+13

+30

+31

September 2014

+18

+19

+17

+12

+20

+20

+23

+5

+13

+15

+30

April 2014

+25

+24

+25

+31

+20

+25

+27

+16

+17

+24

+33

February 2014

+23

+28

+18

+23

+21

+26

+27

+11

+8

+23

+35

December 2013

+24

+25

+23

+24

+21

+27

+29

+10

+10

+24

+35

September 2013

+26

+26

+26

+27

+23

+30

+33

+10

+17

+25

+42

April 2013

+21

+19

+24

+19

+19

+27

+29

+3

+12

+19

+35

February 2013

+29

+28

+30

+30

+27

+31

+36

+12

+20

+30

+36

December 2012

+30

+31

+29

+30

+30

+30

+36

+14

+17

+33

+38

September 2012

+24

+28

+20

+16

+21

+32

+30

+5

+10

+23

+37

July 2012

+27

+26

+29

+21

+31

+30

+32

+16

+16

+31

+37

April 2012

+31

+33

+28

+25

+30

+37

+36

+19

+24

+28

+42

February 2012

+25

+20

+30

+25

+24

+26

+29

+13

+17

+23

+38

October 2011

+24

+24

+24

+23

+21

+29

+31

+7

+15

+25

+31

August 2011

+22

+25

+19

+27

+19

+21

+26

+9

+9

+22

+32

May 2011

+23

+24

+22

+23

+22

+23

+26

+14

+15

+22

+32

December 2010

+21

+20

+23

+23

+20

+23

+26

+13

+15

+21

+31



GARDEN STATE QUALITY OF LIFE INDEX

REGION

COMMUNITY TYPE

North

east

Urban Core

Route 1 Corridor

Central Hills

Northern Shore

Delaware Valley

Garden Core

Urban

Stable Town

Growing

Suburb

May 2021

+31

+23

+23

+33

+26

+20

+13

+20

+26

+26

April 2020

+41

+30

+40

+49

+46

+33

+21

+18

+41

+45

September 2019

+20

+10

+23

+42

+32

+26

+17

+6

+30

+30

February 2019

+21

-1

+16

+27

+21

-3

+9

-1

+15

+19

April 2018

+24

+8

+18

+34

+18

+14

+11

+2

+23

+24

July 2017

+25

+18

+34

+33

+35

+22

+13

+7

+31

+29

July 2015

+21

+4

+22

+35

+22

+17

+10

-2

+28

+23

February 2015

+31

+13

+24

+38

+31

+11

+19

+11

+30

+27

September 2014

+23

+8

+12

+42

+27

+18

+4

+10

+22

+19

April 2014

+24

+10

+22

+43

+29

+25

+23

+4

+26

+33

February 2014

+27

+16

+20

+37

+30

+14

+16

+6

+28

+28

December 2013

+31

+15

+26

+40

+25

+14

+17

+5

+29

+30

September 2013

+27

+8

+21

+52

+33

+27

+19

+1

+34

+32

April 2013

+31

+4

+19

+38

+22

+21

+21

-3

+30

+27

February 2013

+31

+17

+35

+37

+36

+25

+23

+11

+33

+36

December 2012

+36

+18

+26

+47

+40

+21

+31

+9

+37

+37

September 2012

+29

+14

+17

+45

+33

+26

+13

-1

+27

+31

July 2012

+37

+12

+30

+37

+34

+22

+18

+8

+34

+34

April 2012

+38

+26

+27

+44

+34

+22

+28

+20

+35

+36

February 2012

+33

+17

+27

+35

+29

+19

+22

+11

+31

+29

October 2011

+31

+6

+22

+45

+35

+18

+23

-1

+31

+34

August 2011

+24

+16

+21

+38

+27

+26

+6

+4

+29

+25

May 2011

+28

+17

+16

+41

+29

+22

+20

+6

+29

+28

December 2010

+26

+15

+22

+38

+23

+14

+17

+12

+23

+27

A key indicator of the state’s quality of life is the health of the Jersey Shore. In what may be the most Jersey-centric metric for whether the state is returning to normal, 58% of residents say they plan to make a trip down the shore this summer. This result is on the low end of the typical range of between 6 in 10 and 7 in 10 New Jerseyans in past polls who said they planned to hit the beach that summer. The current numbers are higher than last year, though. Monmouth’s April 2020 poll found that 58% of the public had been planning a Jersey Shore trip before the pandemic, but only 27% of the public overall said they were likely to go once Covid hit.

The major dip in shore plans this year versus a normal year is due to the lower number who plan to stay at least a week (19%). This number is usually in the low- to mid-20s. Daytrippers and weekenders, though, should be out in nearly full force according to these poll results, representing 39% of the public. However, families with children are among those less likely to be planning a trip to the Jersey shore this year (62%) compared to the same point ten years ago (78%).

“Jersey Shore crowds may be the most iconic indicator of whether the state is getting back to normal. There may be some vacancies in short-term rentals this summer with fewer families making an extended trip, which makes sense since Covid vaccines aren’t available for most children. However, most New Jersey adults are itching to get back on the beaches and boardwalks,” said Murray.

On an unrelated, yet significant, issue that could have an impact on the quality of life, New Jersey legalized the use of marijuana for recreational purposes this year. Overall, 68% support this, which is similar to 65% who said the same a year ago and 67% of the electorate who voted “yes” on the legalization ballot measure last November. However, only a little more than half (53%) of the state public is aware that recreational marijuana is in fact legal. Another 11% wrongly believe it is not legal and 36% are not sure. The vast majority (86%) of New Jerseyans say this change in marijuana laws has had no impact on the state’s quality of life. Another 4% say legalization has made the quality of life better and 6% say it has made it worse.

“The early days of marijuana legalization have been barely a blip on the radar. We’ll see if that changes once production and retail outlets start opening across the state,” said Murray.

Turning back to other metrics that make up the Garden State Quality of Life Index, the rating that has remained most stable since last year is opinion of one’s own community. More than 3 in 4 New Jerseyans rate their own town or city as an excellent (33%) or good (43%) place to live, with 19% saying it is only fair and 5% rating it as poor. The current 76% positive hometown rating is only slightly lower than the record high of 79% recorded last year.

Environmental ratings are down slightly compared with last year. The current poll registers ratings for local environmental quality at 76% positive – 32% excellent and 44% good. Last year’s 81% result marked a high point for this metric. Another 18% in the current poll rate their local environment as only fair and 6% say it is poor.

The percentage of Garden State residents who currently feel very safe in their own neighborhoods at night stands at 67%, which is down from a high of 74% in 2020. Another 31% say they feel somewhat safe and just 2% do not feel safe at all in their neighborhoods at night.

Opinion of schools has seen the biggest drop among the local quality of life index metrics. Ratings for the job local schools are doing stand at 24% excellent, 40% good, 18% fair, and 8% poor. The combined 64% positive rating is down from last year’s all-time high of 73%. The prior high was 68% in February 2012, but this rating has generally hovered in the low 60s throughout the past decade.

The Monmouth University Poll was conducted by telephone from April 29 to May 4, 2021 with 706 New Jersey adults.  The question results in this release have a margin of error of +/- 3.7 percentage points.  The poll was conducted by the Monmouth University Polling Institute in West Long Branch, NJ.

 

QUESTIONS AND RESULTS                                                                        

(* Some columns may not add to 100% due to rounding.)

1.   Overall, how would you rate New Jersey as a place to live – excellent, good, only fair, or poor?

TREND*:

Excellent/

Good

Excellent

Good

Only Fair

Poor

(VOL)

Don’t know

(n)

May 2021

59%

16%

43%

27%

14%

0%

(706)

April 2020

68%

24%

44%

23%

7%

1%

(704)

September 2019

61%

15%

46%

26%

12%

1%

(713)

February 2019

50%

11%

39%

32%

17%

1%

(604)

April 2018

54%

15%

39%

29%

17%

1%

(703)

July 2017

59%

15%

44%

28%

13%

0%

(800)

May 2016

62%

16%

46%

28%

10%

0%

(806)

July 2015

55%

12%

43%

30%

15%

0%

(503)

May 2015

63%

13%

50%

27%

10%

1%

(500)

February 2015

63%

15%

48%

25%

11%

1%

(805)

September  2014

61%

13%

48%

25%

13%

1%

(802)

June 2014

62%

15%

47%

26%

11%

0%

(800)

April 2014

64%

15%

49%

26%

10%

0%

(803)

February 2014

63%

15%

48%

26%

11%

0%

(803)

December 2013

65%

20%

45%

26%

9%

0%

(802)

September 2013

65%

19%

46%

25%

10%

1%

(783)

April 2013

61%

15%

46%

27%

11%

0%

(806)

February 2013

68%

18%

50%

24%

7%

1%

(803)

December 2012

72%

20%

52%

21%

5%

1%

(816)

September 2012

65%

15%

50%

23%

11%

0%

(805)

July 2012

69%

17%

52%

23%

8%

0%

(803)

April 2012

70%

20%

50%

23%

7%

0%

(804)

February 2012

62%

15%

47%

26%

11%

1%

(803)

October 2011

67%

15%

52%

24%

8%

0%

(817)

August 2011

57%

14%

43%

31%

11%

1%

(802)

May 2011

59%

14%

45%

29%

11%

0%

(807)

December 2010

63%

17%

46%

26%

10%

1%

(2864)

October 2007

63%

17%

46%

25%

12%

1%

(1001)

August 2004

68%

22%

46%

21%

10%

1%

(800)

May 2003

72%

20%

52%

23%

5%

0%

(1002)

April 2001

76%

23%

53%

19%

4%

1%

(802)

March 2000

76%

25%

51%

17%

6%

0%

(800)

May 1999

76%

22%

54%

19%

5%

0%

(800)

February 1994

71%

18%

53%

22%

7%

0%

(801)

March 1990

68%

21%

47%

25%

6%

1%

(800)

February 1988

78%

27%

51%

17%

4%

1%

(800)

February 1987

84%

31%

53%

11%

4%

0%

(800)

May 1985

81%

29%

52%

14%

3%

1%

(500)

October 1984

80%

29%

51%

15%

4%

1%

(1000)

January 1981

66%

16%

50%

26%

7%

1%

(1003)

July 1980

68%

18%

50%

23%

7%

2%

(1005)

[Q2-29 previously released.]

30.   Will you visit the Jersey Shore this summer, or not?  [If YES: Will you stay for a week or longer?]

TREND:

May
2021

Feb.
2013

May
2011

May
2010

May
2009

May
2008

May
2007

For a week or more

19%

28%

23%

27%

21%

26%

23%

For less than a week

39%

43%

42%

42%

38%

34%

37%

No, will not visit

29%

20%

27%

23%

30%

29%

31%

(VOL) Live down shore

8%

6%

5%

6%

7%

7%

5%

(VOL) Don’t know

6%

4%

2%

3%

4%

3%

4%

(n)

(706)

(803)

(807)

(804)

(803)

(803)

(804)

31.   How would you rate your town or city as a place to live – excellent, good, only fair, or poor?

TREND*:

Excellent/

Good

Excellent

Good

Only Fair

Poor

(VOL)

Don’t know

(n)

May 2021

76%

33%

43%

19%

5%

0%

(706)

April 2020

79%

39%

40%

16%

5%

0%

(704)

September 2019

72%

32%

40%

20%

7%

0%

(713)

February 2019

67%

30%

37%

21%

11%

0%

(604)

April 2018

71%

30%

41%

20%

9%

0%

(703)

July 2017

77%

37%

40%

16%

7%

0%

(800)

July 2015

71%

29%

42%

19%

10%

0%

(503)

February 2015

72%

29%

43%

21%

7%

0%

(805)

September 2014

69%

24%

45%

22%

10%

0%

(802)

April 2014

71%

27%

44%

20%

9%

0%

(803)

February 2014

70%

31%

39%

23%

7%

0%

(803)

December 2013

70%

29%

41%

21%

8%

1%

(802)

September 2013

72%

32%

40%

18%

9%

1%

(783)

April 2013

67%

29%

38%

25%

8%

0%

(806)

February 2013

73%

30%

43%

20%

7%

0%

(803)

December 2012

74%

32%

42%

17%

9%

0%

(816)

September 2012

72%

33%

39%

19%

9%

0%

(805)

July 2012

74%

32%

42%

18%

7%

1%

(803)

April 2012

76%

34%

42%

17%

7%

0%

(804)

February 2012

74%

33%

41%

21%

5%

0%

(803)

October 2011

73%

26%

47%

20%

8%

0%

(817)

August 2011

76%

28%

48%

18%

6%

0%

(802)

May 2011

73%

33%

40%

20%

7%

0%

(807)

December 2010

73%

27%

46%

20%

8%

0%

(2864)

May 2003

74%

29%

45%

19%

7%

0%

(1002)

April 2001

73%

28%

45%

21%

6%

0%

(802)

May 1995

70%

30%

40%

21%

8%

0%

(802)

June 1994

72%

31%

41%

19%

9%

0%

(801)

September 1988

72%

26%

46%

18%

9%

1%

(500)

October 1984

71%

30%

41%

21%

7%

1%

(999)

June 1980

67%

23%

44%

24%

9%

0%

(1005)

May 1977

66%

25%

41%

24%

10%

0%

(1005)

 

[QUESTIONS 32-34 WERE ROTATED]

32.   How would you rate the quality of the environment in the area where you live – excellent, good, only fair, or poor?

TREND*:

Excellent/

Good

Excellent

Good

Only Fair

Poor

(VOL)

Don’t know

(n)

May 2021

76%

32%

44%

18%

6%

0%

(706)

April 2020

81%

36%

45%

15%

4%

0%

(704)

September 2019

72%

31%

41%

22%

6%

1%

(713)

February 2019

71%

27%

44%

21%

8%

0%

(604)

April 2018

73%

29%

44%

20%

6%

1%

(703)

July 2017

76%

37%

39%

14%

8%

1%

(800)

July 2015

71%

27%

44%

20%

9%

0%

(503)

February 2015

72%

27%

45%

23%

4%

0%

(805)

September 2014

72%

24%

48%

21%

5%

1%

(802)

April 2014

76%

27%

49%

18%

6%

0%

(803)

February 2014

73%

29%

44%

21%

6%

0%

(803)

December 2013

69%

27%

42%

24%

7%

0%

(802)

September 2013

75%

30%

45%

18%

7%

1%

(783)

April 2013

70%

27%

43%

22%

7%

0%

(806)

February 2013

71%

26%

45%

24%

4%

2%

(803)

December 2012

73%

25%

48%

20%

7%

1%

(816)

September 2012

72%

30%

42%

20%

7%

0%

(805)

July 2012

74%

30%

44%

19%

7%

1%

(803)

April 2012

75%

30%

45%

18%

6%

1%

(804)

February 2012

77%

29%

48%

17%

5%

0%

(803)

October 2011

72%

25%

47%

19%

9%

0%

(817)

August 2011

79%

31%

48%

16%

5%

0%

(802)

May 2011

79%

33%

46%

15%

6%

0%

(807)

December 2010

66%

14%

52%

25%

9%

0%

(2864)

April 2001

70%

27%

43%

22%

7%

1%

(402)

September 1988

53%

10%

43%

31%

15%

1%

(500)

33.   How would you rate the job your local schools are doing – excellent, good, only fair, or poor?

TREND*:

Excellent/

Good

Excellent

Good

Only Fair

Poor

(VOL)

Don’t know

(n)

May 2021

64%

24%

40%

18%

8%

10%

(706)

April 2020

73%

33%

40%

16%

4%

7%

(704)

September 2019

60%

26%

34%

23%

9%

9%

(713)

February 2019

59%

19%

40%

22%

10%

9%

(604)

April 2018

60%

24%

36%

23%

10%

7%

(703)

July 2017

65%

26%

39%

20%

10%

6%

(800)

July 2015

60%

27%

33%

22%

9%

8%

(503)

February 2015

61%

21%

40%

24%

8%

7%

(805)

September 2014

60%

21%

39%

24%

9%

7%

(802)

April 2014

63%

24%

39%

22%

9%

6%

(803)

February 2014

61%

22%

39%

22%

10%

7%

(803)

December 2013

60%

20%

40%

23%

12%

5%

(802)

September 2013

62%

24%

38%

21%

7%

9%

(783)

April 2013

59%

21%

38%

27%

9%

5%

(806)

February 2013

64%

24%

40%

20%

7%

9%

(803)

December 2012

61%

21%

40%

23%

7%

9%

(816)

September 2012

61%

27%

34%

21%

10%

8%

(805)

July 2012

61%

22%

39%

20%

11%

8%

(803)

April 2012

63%

23%

40%

21%

7%

8%

(804)

February 2012

68%

26%

42%

16%

8%

8%

(803)

October 2011

60%

21%

39%

20%

13%

7%

(817)

August 2011

63%

19%

44%

26%

6%

5%

(802)

May 2011

63%

24%

39%

22%

10%

6%

(807)

December 2010

64%

24%

40%

23%

8%

5%

(2864)

August 2004

61%

24%

37%

17%

12%

9%

(800)

April 2001

64%

21%

43%

21%

6%

9%

(802)

September 1999

62%

18%

44%

21%

9%

8%

(802)

September 1998

62%

20%

42%

23%

9%

7%

(804)

February 1996

60%

20%

40%

20%

11%

9%

(804)

September 1993

52%

16%

36%

29%

14%

5%

(801)

January 1992

53%

15%

38%

26%

15%

5%

(800)

October 1987

60%

14%

46%

23%

6%

11%

(500)

October 1986

55%

15%

40%

26%

10%

9%

(800)

October 1983

59%

16%

43%

23%

10%

8%

(802)

May 1978

52%

12%

40%

25%

12%

11%

(1003)

34.   How safe do you feel in your neighborhood at night – very safe, somewhat safe, or not at all safe?

TREND*:

Very safe

Somewhat safe

Not at all safe

(VOL)

Don’t know

(n)

May 2021

67%

31%

2%

0%

(706)

April 2020

74%

22%

3%

1%

(704)

September 2019

68%

27%

5%

0%

(713)

February 2019

64%

29%

7%

0%

(604)

April 2018

65%

29%

5%

0%

(703)

July 2017

71%

22%

6%

0%

(800)

July 2015

67%

27%

6%

0%

(503)

February 2015

62%

33%

4%

0%

(805)

September 2014

58%

36%

6%

0%

(802)

April 2014

66%

30%

4%

1%

(803)

February 2014

67%

28%

6%

0%

(803)

December 2013

60%

33%

7%

0%

(802)

September 2013

65%

27%

7%

1%

(783)

April 2013

66%

28%

6%

0%

(806)

February 2013

63%

30%

6%

1%

(803)

December 2012

64%

29%

6%

1%

(816)

September 2012

65%

25%

6%

0%

(805)

July 2012

60%

32%

7%

1%

(803)

April 2012

64%

31%

5%

1%

(804)

February 2012

62%

32%

5%

0%

(803)

October 2011

62%

31%

7%

0%

(817)

August 2011

63%

31%

6%

0%

(802)

May 2011

68%

27%

5%

0%

(807)

December 2010

59%

35%

6%

0%

(2864)

February 1993

42%

44%

13%

0%

(801)

October 1987

51%

36%

11%

2%

(499)

October 1984

53%

36%

9%

2%

(500)

May 1981

43%

43%

13%

1%

(497)

35.   Overall, do you support or oppose legalizing the possession of small amounts of marijuana for personal use?

  TREND:

May
2021

April
2020

Feb.
2019

April
2018

April
2014

Support

68%

65%

62%

59%

48%

Oppose

29%

32%

32%

37%

47%

(VOL) Don’t know

3%

4%

5%

5%

6%

   (n)

(706)

(704)

(604)

(703)

(803)

36.   Is it currently legal or not legal in New Jersey for anyone over the age of 21 to use marijuana for recreational purposes, or aren’t you sure?

May
2021

Legal

53%

Not legal

11%

Not sure

36%

   (n)

(706)

37.   It is now legal in New Jersey for anyone over the age of 21 to use and purchase small quantities of marijuana for recreational purposes. Have you seen a change in the state’s quality of life because of this or has there been no real change?  [If CHANGE: Has it changed for the better or worse?]

May
2021

Change for better

4%

Change for worse

6%

No real change

86%

(VOL) Don’t know

4%

   (n)

(706)

* Note:  All trend results prior to 2005 come from Rutgers University’s Eagleton Poll.

 

METHODOLOGY

The Monmouth University Poll was sponsored and conducted by the Monmouth University Polling Institute from April 29 to May 4, 2021 with a random sample of 706 New Jersey adults age 18 and older, in English. This includes 283 contacted by a live interviewer on a landline telephone and 423 contacted by a live interviewer on a cell phone. Telephone numbers were selected through random digit dialing and landline respondents were selected with a modified Troldahl-Carter youngest adult household screen. Monmouth is responsible for all aspects of the survey design, data weighting and analysis. The full sample is weighted for region, age, education, gender and race based on US Census information (ACS 2018 one-year survey). Data collection support provided by Braun Research (field) and Dynata (RDD sample).  For results based on this sample, one can say with 95% confidence that the error attributable to sampling has a maximum margin of plus or minus 3.7 percentage points (unadjusted for sample design). Sampling error can be larger for sub-groups (see table below). In addition to sampling error, one should bear in mind that question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of opinion polls.

Region in this report is defined by county boundaries:  Northeast (Bergen, Passaic), Urban Core (Essex, Hudson), Route 1 Corridor (Mercer, Middlesex, Union), Central Hills (Hunterdon, Morris, Somerset), Northern Shore (Monmouth, Ocean), Delaware Valley (Burlington, Camden, Gloucester), and Garden Core (Atlantic, Cape May, Cumberland, Salem, Sussex, Warren).

DEMOGRAPHICS (weighted)

Self-Reported

22% Republican

40% Independent

38% Democrat

 

49% Male

51% Female

 

29% 18-34

35% 35-54

36% 55+

 

57% White

13% Black

19% Hispanic

11% Asian/Other

 

63% No degree

37% 4 year degree

 

 

MARGIN OF ERROR

unweighted  sample

moe

(+/-)

TOTAL

 

706

3.7%

REGISTERED VOTER

Yes

661

3.8%

 

No

45

14.6%

SELF-REPORTED PARTY ID

Republican

124

8.8%

Independent

299

5.7%

Democrat

267

6.0%

REGION

North

365

5.1%

 

Central

176

7.4%

 

South

165

7.6%

GENDER

Male

366

5.1%

Female

340

5.3%

AGE

18-34

135

8.4%

35-54

271

6.0%

55+

294

5.7%

RACE

White non-Hispanic

444

4.7%

Other

236

6.4%

COLLEGE GRADUATE

No degree

276

5.9%

 

4 year degree

428

4.7%

INCOME

<$50K

127

8.7%

$50 to <$100K

232

6.4%

$100K+

298

5.7%

CHILDREN IN HOME

Yes

215

6.7%

 

No

487

4.5%

 

(Visited 29 times, 1 visits today)

Comments are closed.

News From Around the Web

The Political Landscape